Month: November 2024

I am often asked by friends and acquaintances why I dislike Irish Rail despite being a railway enthusiast. The answer is that when faced with the possibility of doing things correctly, they will screw it up and deliver a sub-standard outcome.

If Irish Rail was a privately financed entity operating in a competitive environment, that would be on its owners. However, Irish Rail is a loss making State owned monopoly. As such, its failures effect society as a whole.

Take Enfield, Co. Meath as an example. Historically Enfield had two platforms – in fact, it still has, but only one is in use. As a practice, this actually makes sense, especially in the era of disability access, having only one platform makes it easier to provide services and eliminates the need for lifts with their associated maintenance.

The problem at Enfield arises in that when the line was resignalled for mini CTC, the opportunity to change the layout to relocate the passing loop to east or west of the station was not taken. As a result, the passing loop here is effectively useless (Enfield is not the only such station – Irish Rail have specialised in replicating this situation nationwide).

Whilst this is not evident most of the time due to the paucity of trains on the Sligo Line, there is a morning service from Dublin to Sligo that cannot serve Enfield due to the present track layout. This train uses the loop on the Up side, running alongside the disused platform (in grey), whilst the Dublin bound train it is passing uses the mainline and serves the platform in use (in purple).

A better layout would have been to place the passing loop on the Dublin side of the station.

Such a layout would allow a train heading to Dublin to serve the platform whilst the train to Sligo sat in the loop (in brown). After the former had passed the Enfield end of the loop fully, the Sligo bound train could emerge from the loop and serve the station before continuing west.

The other thing I don’t like about Irish Rail is no forward planning nor obvious co-operation with local authority planners to co-ordinate housing developments alongside their railway (unless CIE owns the land, in which case CIE’s status as a property development company with the inconvenience of a public transport network attached comes into play). This would also require some future proofing when it came to railway layouts. In this regard, Enfield would have a future as a two platform station, but with the currently disused Up platform re-purposed as a turnback siding.

In this example, in addition to the passing loop on the Dublin side of the station, a turnback siding would continue on on the site of the existing loop but terminating on the Dublin side of the road overbridge at the Sligo end of the station. This would allow trains to run from Dublin to Enfield and return and also not block the running line for Sligo trains.